Qualification of TLC-equipment used in analysis of the combined herbal medicines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24959/nphj.15.2091Keywords:
quality control system, analysis, TLC-equipment, KlimasedAbstract
On the example of Klimased drug with the purpose of choosing the analytical equipment for quality control of combined drugs of the plant origin the study on major functional and performance characteristics (design qualification) of the equipment used according to pharmacopoeial requirements(SPhU and USP) and the target analytical tasks has been conducted. It allows to select equipment for an enterprise. A comparative analysis of functional and technical specifications of the devices to perform analysis of the combined drugs from the medicinal plant raw material by the method of thin-layer chromatography has been conducted. It has been experimentally proven that the configuration of the chromatographic chamber does not affect the result of the analysis, chambers manufactured by Sorbfil are more affordable by economic indicators. When analysing the medicinal plant raw material and drugs from it the TLC and HPTLC plates on all substrates with an UV indicator can be used, it is advisable to make the final choice by economic components or their availability. Characteristics of the devices for applying solutions of chromatograms have revealed that when choosing microsyringes the best indicator is its volume. When comparing devices for detecting or quenching fluorescence manufactured by Sorbfil (Russia) and Spectroline (USA) it has been proven that each of the devices studied can be used to identify chromatographic zones. The manufacturer Spectroline has the quality certificate ISO 9001:2008 and is more affordable, therefore, it is superior to irradiator UVS-254/365 manufactured by Sorbfil. Among the devices for spraying chromatograms the sprayers of GGB (USA) have a comfortable design and a suitable volume, but by cost they are much more expensive than sprayers of Sorbfil (Russia). It is advisable to make the final choice based on the economic component.
References
Волков Г. Л., Краснобрижая Е. Н., Жукова А. И. и др. // «Фармацевтическая отрасль», 2011. № 4 (27). – С. 36-38.
Державна Фармакопея України / Державне підприємство «Науково-експертний фармакопейний центр». – 1-е вид. – Х.: РІРЕГ, 2001. – 556 с.
Настойки, экстракты, эликсиры и их стандартизация / Под ред. проф. В.Л. Багировой, проф. В.А. Северцева. – СПб.: СпецЛит, 2001. – 223 с.
Осмоловская И., Люлина Н. // Ремедиум. – 2005. – № 5. – С. 58-62.
Хохлова К.О., Вишневська Л. І., Гарна С. В. та ін. // Фармаком. – 2013. – № 1. – С. 38-51.
Хроматография. Практическое приложение метода: В 2-х ч., ч. 1 / Э. Хефтман, Т. Кастер, А. Нидервизер и др. – М.: Мир, 1986. – 422 с.
Analytical Instrument Qualification and System Validation / Ludwig Huber // Agilent Technologies Printed in Germany, January 1, 2009. – 61 p.
Design Qualification Operational Qualification HPLC Equipment Case Study Publication from www.labcompliance.com Revision 1.02 May 12, 2001.
Unites States Pharmacopeia, Chapter , Analytical Instrument Qualification, Rockville, USA, 2008.3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 National University of Pharmacy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
