Modern approaches to the evaluation of mechanical medical devices for stopping bleeding (tourniquets) for use in combat conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24959/nphj.26.214

Keywords:

tourniquets; military medicine; health technology assessment; equipment and supplies; tactical medicine.

Abstract

Traumatic bleeding remains the leading preventable cause of deaths on the battlefield. Mechanical tourniquets are a key part of pre-medical care in both tactical and civilian medicine. At the same time, the variety of models, differences in design, and variability in application conditions make it necessary to have a standardized, comprehensive, and evidence-based evaluation of these medical devices (MD). A promising tool for solving this problem is health technology assessment (HTA) approaches adapted to the specificities of the military environment.

Aim. To substantiate a comprehensive HTA-based approach to evaluating tactical mechanical tourniquets, which can be used to make informed management decisions regarding the approval of MD for use in tactical and civilian medicine, budget-funded procurement, etc.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted using the HTA methodology as an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of tactical tourniquets. The source materials were scientific publications, international recommendations and protocols (in particular, CoTCCC), standards and regulatory documents of the FDA, EU MDR, ISO, as well as national regulatory and methodological acts of Ukraine in the field of the medical device evaluation. Analytical-descriptive, comparative, and structural-logical methods were used.

Results. The application of HTA as an interdisciplinary methodological basis for the comprehensive assessment of mechanical tourniquets in the Ukrainian healthcare system, taking into account the conditions of martial law, has been substantiated. The key HTA domains for tactical tourniquets have been identified, including functional and clinical effectiveness, safety, mechanical reliability, ergonomics, compliance with international standards, economic feasibility, and post-marketing surveillance. Particular attention is paid to the role of real-world data and the military medicine experience in forming the evidence base. An HTA matrix for evaluating mechanical tourniquets and an algorithm for making managerial decisions have been proposed. It has been shown that the integration of НТА with regulatory requirements and public procurement mechanisms ensures scientifically sound selection, standardization, and the rational use of tourniquets, contributing to improved safety, quality, and cost-effectiveness of medical care.

Conclusions. A comprehensive assessment of mechanical tourniquets cannot be limited to technical or laboratory tests alone. It should include the analysis of biomechanical effectiveness (in particular, the achievement of arterial occlusion pressure), clinical effectiveness based on real combat injury registries, cost-effectiveness assessment, and operational suitability in extreme conditions of use. The use of the HTA approach provides a scientifically sound basis for making managerial decisions in the military medical support system and contributes to the more efficient use of resources in the defense and healthcare sectors.

References

  1. Holcomb, J. B., Dorlac, W. C., & Drew, B. G. (2023). Rethinking limb tourniquet conversion in the prehospital environment. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 95(6), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004134
  2. Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) Guidelines for BLS/ALS Clinicians. Final 2025-1-2. (2025). Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (C-TECC). https://www.c-tecc.org/news/guidelines-2024
  3. TCCC Guidelines. Care Under Fire. Threat. (n. d.). Allogy. https://books.allogy.com/web/tenant/8/books/b729b76a-1a34-4bf7-b76b-66bb2072b2a7/
  4. Nazarkina, V. M., Koba, T. M., Podolskyi, I. M., & Lytkin, D. V. (2025). Analiz stanu zabezpechennia mekhanichnymy vyrobamy dlia zupynky krovotech u sektori bezpeky ta oborony Ukrainy [Analysis of the availability of mechanical devices for stopping bleeding in the security and defense sector of Ukraine]. Ukrainian Journal of Military Medicine, 6(3, suppl. 3). https://doi.org/10.46847/ujmm.2025.3(6)s3 [in Ukrainian].
  5. World Health Organization. (2025). Health technology assessment of medical devices (2nd ed.). World Health Organization.
  6. Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy «Pro zatverdzhennia nastanovy z derzhavnoi otsinky medychnykh tekhnolohii dlia likarskykh zasobiv» № 593 (2021, Berezen 29). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0593282-21#n10 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Nastanova ST-N MOZU «Derzhavna otsinka medychnykh tekhnolohii shchodo medychnykh vyrobiv» № 42-9.2:2025. https://www.apteka.ua/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/1_Nastanova.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  8. Nazarkina, V. M., Podolskyi, I. M., & Kryvenko, E. V. (2025). Ukhvalennia rishen u systemi otsinky medychnykh tekhnolohii: Osnovni pidkhody, kryterii ta umovy [Decision-making in the health technology assessment system: Basic approaches, criteria, and conditions]. Sotsialna farmatsiia v okhoroni zdorovia, 11(3), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.24959/sphhcj.25.360 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Calkins, M. D., Snow, C., Costello, M., & Bentley, T. B. (2000). Evaluation of possible battlefield tourniquet systems for the far-forward setting. Military Medicine, 165(5), 379–384. https://scispace.com/pdf/evaluation-of-possible-battlefield-tourniquet-systems-for-xipjf7d866.pdf
  10. Jarrassier, A., Boutonnet, M., Duranteau, J., Travers, S., Prat, N., Dubourg, O., Pasquier, P., & Libert, N. (2025). Initial management of haemorrhagic war casualties: tactical priorities and innovative approaches in modern and future warfare. Critical Care, 29(1), 509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05752-6
  11. Johnston, L. R., Parker, W. J., Walker, P., & Bradley, M. J. (2024). Tourniquets. Current Trauma Reports, 10, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-024-00272-0
  12. Nakaz Ministerstva oborony Ukrainy «Pro zatverdzhennia Minimalnykh vymoh do zasobiv dlia zupynky krovotechi mekhanichnykh vorotkovoho typu (turniketiv), yaki zastosovuiutsia sylamy bezpeky i sylamy oborony dlia nadannia taktychnoi dohospitalnoi dopomohy pid chas vedennia voiennykh (boiovykh) dii ta pidhotovky syl bezpeky i syl oborony do zastosuvannia za pryznachenniam» № 663 (2025, Zhovten 4). https://mod.gov.ua/diyalnist/normativno-pravova-baza/nakaz-ministerstva-oboroni-ukrayini-vid-vid-04-10-2025-663 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Comparison of 4 Tactical Tourniquets Used in War Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04870814
  14. Wang, X., Xia, D., Zhou, P., Gui, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Comparing the performance of tourniquet application between self-aid and buddy-aid: In ordinary and simulated scenarios. American Journal of Translational Research, 13(6), 6134–6141.
  15. Beaven, A., Ballard, M., Sellon, E., Briard, R., & Parker, P. J. (2018). The Combat Application Tourniquet Versus the Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 18(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.55460/P6Z3-VN4B
  16. Katzir, A., Krispel, J., Acker, A., Mahmoud, J., Rami, M., Meir, L., & Yoram, A. W. (2026). Outcomes of Prolonged Tourniquet Application on the Battlefield: Is a Liberal Application Policy Always Justifiable? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 40(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003089
  17. Xacur-Trabulce, A., Casas-Fuentes, G., Ruiz-Vasconcelos, V., Reitz, M. M., Henry, S. M., Scalea, T. M., & Ribeiro Jr., M. A. F. (2025). Tourniquet-related complications in extremity injuries: A scoping review of the literature. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 20(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00625-3
  18. Lukiianchuk, V., Linchevskyy, O., Dorlac, W. C., Rachel, M. R., Pamela, B. A., Shahram, A., Sahil, P., Frank, K. B., Travis, M. P., & John, B. H. (2025). Morbidity and mortality associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury after prolonged tourniquet use: A wartime single-center treatment algorithm. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 99(3S), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004677
  19. Pascoe, B., & Weinrauch, P. (2024). Timeline effects of tourniquets used in trauma care. Journal of High Threat & Austere Medicine, 6(2), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.33235/JHTAM.6.2.26-32
  20. Montgomery, H. R., Hammesfahr, R., Fisher, A. D., Cain, J. S., Greydanus, D. J., Butler Jr, F. K., Goolsby, C., & Eastman, A. L. (2019). 2019 recommended limb tourniquets in Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 19(4), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.55460/HQDV-7SXN
  21. Bennett, B. L., & Christensen, R. (2019). Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care updates and expands recommended tourniquet list. Wilderness Medical Society Magazine, 36(3). https://wms.org/magazine/magazine/1245/tourniquet/Default.aspx
  22. Medical Devices. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices
  23. Racolța, A. (2020). Life Cycle Cost (LCC) For Military Systems. In Defense resources management in the 21st century (p. 205–213). https://codrm.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/25_RACOLTA.pdf

Published

2026-03-31